Essay On Famine Affluence And Morality

If we can help, we must-and any excuse is hypocrisy.Singer's extreme stand on the standard of giving has become a powerful topic of discussion in modern philosophy and continues to challenge people's attitudes towards extreme poverty.This attractively packaged, concise edition collects the original article, two of Singer's more recent popular writings on our obligations to others around the world, and a new introduction by Singer that discusses his current thinking. audience with the rather explicit intention of increasing donations to charitable organizations involved in foreign aid. Admittedly, the introductions are nearly as long as the original essay and updated article, but the whole thing is worth a read.

Tags: Process Essay LessonBlood Essay Honest SportProcter Gamble Research PaperSpm Essay About HomeworkResearch Paper On Genetically Modified FoodEssay On My Relationship With My FamilyWriting Qualitative Research Paper

uses cookies to personalize content, tailor ads and improve the user experience.

By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies.

This is a reprint of an essay, "Famine, Affluence, and Morality," that Peter Singer wrote 40 years ago.

As Bill and Melinda Gates write in the new Forward, maybe "it's time has now come." I remember reading it as a student some twenty years ago and I'm even more persuaded by it today than then.

In addition to rational philosophy, Singer cites the Church Fathers who wrote: "The bread which you withhold belongs to the hungry; the clothing you shut away, to the naked; and the money you bury in the earth is the redemption and freedom of the penniless" (Decretum Gratiani).

Interestingly, three of the four most generous philanthropists, Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, and Andrew Carnegie were freethinkers (agnostic or atheists) who gave for humanitarian instead of religious reasons.

Singer's claim is as simple as it is profound: "If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything else morally significant, we ought, morally, to do it."This is a reprint of an essay, "Famine, Affluence, and Morality," that Peter Singer wrote 40 years ago.

Singer's claim is as simple as it is profound: "If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything else morally significant, we ought, morally, to do it." Or, as Thucydides wrote over 2,000 years ago, "there will be justice when those who are not injured are as outraged as those who are." Since the original publication of Singer's essay public sentiment against those suffering from poverty and refugees has been hardened by politicians who vilify the poor and religious leaders who favor citing the epistle admonishing that those who do not work should not eat.

Foreword: Bill and Melinda Gates Preface: Peter Singer Acknowledgments Famine, Affluence, and Morality The Singer Solution to World Poverty What Should a Billionaire Give - and What Should You? De Camp Professor of Bioethics, University Center for Human Values, Princeton University Foreword by Bill and Melinda Gates Peter Singer has been described as the world's most influential philosopher.

His books include Animal Liberation, Practical Ethics, Rethinking Life and Death, One World, The Life You Can Save, and The Point of View of the Universe.