In a court filing from March, lawyers for Harvard said both sides have “submitted expert reports that analyze identical data yet reach diametrically opposed conclusions.” Friday’s public filings could provide a rare look at how Harvard makes its undergraduate admissions decisions.Many documents in the case so far have been submitted to the court under seal, and both sides have tussled for years over which details can be made public, with Harvard citing concerns about applicants’ privacy.the University of Texas due to a new lawsuit that challenges the University of Texas’ decision to continuing to factor in race in college admissions: Abigail Fisher, a white female, applied for admission to the University of Texas but was denied.
Both sides are due to submit lengthy documents Friday in Boston federal court that will serve as a preview for an October bench trial, in which a federal judge will decide whether the school’s affirmative-action practices are unconstitutional or illegal under federal civil-rights law.
The lawsuit against Harvard was filed in 2014 by Students for Fair Admissions, a nonprofit whose members include Asian-American students who were denied admission to Harvard.
It has already directed resources into challenge what it considers to be “reverse discrimination” in university admissions.
Charlie Savage, August 1, 2017, New York Times, Justice Department to take on affirmative action in college admissions, https:// Department of Justice has decided to divert resources into the question of whether or not are discriminated against in the college admissions process.
Supporters and critics of the project said it was clearly targeting admissions programs that can give members of generally disadvantaged groups, like black and Latino students, an edge over other applicants with comparable or higher test scores.
The project is another sign that the civil rights division is taking on a conservative tilt under President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions.The plaintiffs allege Harvard intentionally discriminates against Asian-Americans by limiting the number of Asian-American students who are admitted and holding them to a higher standard than students of other races.Friday’s motions are likely to include thousands of pages of supporting documents both sides have gathered over the past two years, including dozens of depositions and statistical analyses of detailed admissions data covering six years, during which roughly 200,000 people applied to Harvard.In a 4-3 ruling upholding the use of racial preferences in public university admissions, Justice Anthony Kennedy left the door open in 2016 to future legal challenges by saying universities must continue to review their affirmative-action policies to assess their positive and negative effects.Many elite colleges have come to Harvard’s defense.So, again, a specific point system is not acceptable, but subtle consideration is.Although the US Supreme Court made significant rulings on the issue, it took it up again in 2015 in Fisher vs.Background The affirmative action debate in the US is a never ending one and the latest controversy surrounds a federal court case that challenges the use of affirmative action in admissions by Harvard.The Wall Street Journal explained the case in June of this year — A closely watched lawsuit accusing Harvard University of discriminating against Asian-American applicants is approaching a critical juncture, as court filings later this week are expected to reveal new details about how the school’s undergraduate admissions process affects different ethnic and racial groups.The document does not explicitly identify whom the Justice Department considers at risk of discrimination because of affirmative action admissions policies.But the phrasing it uses, “intentional race-based discrimination,” cuts to the heart of programs designed to bring more minority students to university campuses.